Rights in Australia 1991-1992: Decision Makers' Sample
The principal objectives of the Rights in Australia project were: to establish the level of support for civil liberties and civil rights among Australians; to determine the firmness or solidity of Australians' attitudes to civil liberties; to explore how Australians make up their mind in specific civil liberties controversies, especially where there are competing sides to a situation; and to identify principal characteristics which might affect the support or rejection of certain civil liberties. The first stage of this project consisted of the surveying of a representative sample of the Australian population (SSDA No 618). The present stage comprises interviews with a 'decision makers' sample - individuals from two groups, the legislative sample (members of major political parties) and the legal sample (judiciary and executive officers including public servants, public prosecutors and police officers).
The decision makers survey consisted of a telephone interview, followed by a questionnaire distributed by mail. The telephone interview began with questions designed to establish a general measure of the respondent's attitudes to equality of rights and tolerance of actions against the government. This was followed by a section dealing with more specific rights issues - freedom of speech, racial discrimination, and freedom of choice, including censorship, euthanasia, abortion and homosexuality. Further sections dealt with: legal rights - right to trial, right to trial by jury, contact with the police; sexual discrimination; racial prejudice towards Asians and Aboriginals; and the issue of a Bill of Rights for Australia. The mail survey consisted of additional questions covering the same range of issues. In the telephone interview, background information was collected on political orientation, vote at last election, interest in politics and compulsory voting. Participants from the legislative sample were not asked the political involvement series of questions.
Demographic information collected about the respondent included age, sex, country of birth and year of arrival in Australia, citizenship status, age starting and leaving school, type of school attended, highest qualification, religion and frequency of church attendance, marital status, numbers of children and numbers in the household, occupation and labour force status, trade union membership and household income.
The decision makers survey consisted of a telephone interview, followed by a questionnaire distributed by mail. The telephone interview began with questions designed to establish a general measure of the respondent's attitudes to equality of rights and tolerance of actions against the government. This was followed by a section dealing with more specific rights issues - freedom of speech, racial discrimination, and freedom of choice, including censorship, euthanasia, abortion and homosexuality. Further sections dealt with: legal rights - right to trial, right to trial by jury, contact with the police; sexual discrimination; racial prejudice towards Asians and Aboriginals; and the issue of a Bill of Rights for Australia. The mail survey consisted of additional questions covering the same range of issues. In the telephone interview, background information was collected on political orientation, vote at last election, interest in politics and compulsory voting. Participants from the legislative sample were not asked the political involvement series of questions.
Demographic information collected about the respondent included age, sex, country of birth and year of arrival in Australia, citizenship status, age starting and leaving school, type of school attended, highest qualification, religion and frequency of church attendance, marital status, numbers of children and numbers in the household, occupation and labour force status, trade union membership and household income.
Dataset ID:
au.edu.anu.ada.ddi.00619
Principal Investigator:
Keywords:
The Study Description consists of information about the data collection, study, or compilation that the DDI-compliant documentation file describes. This section includes information about how the study should be cited, who collected or compiled the data, who distributes the data, keywords about the content of the data, summary (abstract) of the content of the data, data collection methods and processing, etc. Note that some content of the Study Description's Citation -- e.g., Responsibility Statement -- may be identical to that of the Documentation Citation. This is usually the case when the producer of a data collection also produced the print or electronic codebook for that data collection.
Australian Rights Project (ARP)
Role:
Research Initiator
Affiliations:
Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University
CATI Facility
Role:
Data Gathering Staff
Production
Producer:
Data Archives
Abbreviation:
SSDA
Affiliation:
The Australian National University
Production Date:
1 Jan 2013
Funding Agency/Sponsor:
Research School of Social Sciences The Australian National University
New South Wales Law Foundation
Copyright:
Copyright © 2007, Australian National University. All rights reserved.
Distribution
Distributor:
The Australian National University
Abbreviation:
Affiliation:
Political Science, The University of Melbourne
Depositor:
Rights in Australia Project
Research School of Social Sciences
Australian National University
GPO Box 4
Canberra ACT 2601
Research School of Social Sciences
Australian National University
GPO Box 4
Canberra ACT 2601
Affiliation:
Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University
Deposit Date:
2 Nov 1992
Version Statement:
Version:
First version. 5 July, 2007
Date:
5 Jul 2007
Notes:
This version combines the files 00619-m, 00619-p, 00619-pt, 00619-s, 00619-st which are now superceded.
Responsibility Statement:
Australian Data Archive
Study Information
Research Collection Date:
27 Apr 1992 - 7 Aug 1992
1 Jul 1992 - 1 Oct 1992
Country:
Australia
Geographic Area:
National
Geographic Unit:
State
Unit of Analysis:
Individual
Universe:
Legislative Sample:
All members in the major political parties - Liberal, Labour and National - elected to federal and state government in Australia.
Legal Sample:
The legal sample included three systematic samples; (i) a sample of currently practicing barristers and solicitors; (ii) currently appointed magistrates and (iii) currently appointed public prosecutors.
Samples were obtained from:
i) Alphabetic list of legal practitioners in the 1992 edition of the Australian Legal Directory
ii) Lists of magistrates provided by the Chief Stipendiary Magistrate's Office
iii) Lists of public prosecutors from the Director of Public Prosecutions
All members in the major political parties - Liberal, Labour and National - elected to federal and state government in Australia.
Legal Sample:
The legal sample included three systematic samples; (i) a sample of currently practicing barristers and solicitors; (ii) currently appointed magistrates and (iii) currently appointed public prosecutors.
Samples were obtained from:
i) Alphabetic list of legal practitioners in the 1992 edition of the Australian Legal Directory
ii) Lists of magistrates provided by the Chief Stipendiary Magistrate's Office
iii) Lists of public prosecutors from the Director of Public Prosecutions
Kind of Data:
survey
Methodology
Time Method:
Cross-sectional (one time) study
Data Collector:
Australian Data Archive
The Australian National University
The Australian National University
Sampling Procedure:
Stratified random sample
Legislative Sample:
A complete ennumeration of members of major political parties.
Legal Sample:
Names of barristers and solicitors were taken at random from the Directory until the required sample of 150 barristers and 150 solicitors was obtained. Similarly, a random sample of 5/12 of the population of magistrates was selected systematically, giving a sample of 145 magistrates. The public prosecutors sample was a complete ennumeration with all public prosecutors from the lists of the state offices selected.
Number of cases from telephone interview: 551 (Legislative) and 477 (Legal)
Number of cases from mail survey: 213 (Legislative) and 271 (Legal)
Legislative Sample:
A complete ennumeration of members of major political parties.
Legal Sample:
Names of barristers and solicitors were taken at random from the Directory until the required sample of 150 barristers and 150 solicitors was obtained. Similarly, a random sample of 5/12 of the population of magistrates was selected systematically, giving a sample of 145 magistrates. The public prosecutors sample was a complete ennumeration with all public prosecutors from the lists of the state offices selected.
Number of cases from telephone interview: 551 (Legislative) and 477 (Legal)
Number of cases from mail survey: 213 (Legislative) and 271 (Legal)
Mode of Data Collection:
telephone interview
self-completion (mail out, mail back)
Type of Research Instrument:
structured
Class of the Study:
Level 2
Data Access
Citation Requirements:
All manuscripts based in whole or in part on these data should:
(i) identify the data and original investigators by using the recommended bibliographic reference to the data file
(ii) acknowledge the Australian Data Archive and, where the data are made available through the Australian Data Archive by another archive, acknowledge that archive;
Galligan, B., et al. Rights in Australia 1991-1992: Decision Makers' sample. [Computer file]. Canberra: Australian Data Archive, The Australian National University, 1992.
(iii) declare that those who carried out the original analysis and collection of the data bear no responsibility for the further analysis or interpretation of them.
(i) identify the data and original investigators by using the recommended bibliographic reference to the data file
(ii) acknowledge the Australian Data Archive and, where the data are made available through the Australian Data Archive by another archive, acknowledge that archive;
Galligan, B., et al. Rights in Australia 1991-1992: Decision Makers' sample. [Computer file]. Canberra: Australian Data Archive, The Australian National University, 1992.
(iii) declare that those who carried out the original analysis and collection of the data bear no responsibility for the further analysis or interpretation of them.
Deposit Requirements:
In order to assemble essential information about archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about users research activities, individuals are required to email ADA (ada@anu.edu.au) with the bibliographic details and, where available, online links to any published work (including journal articles, books or book chapters, conference presentations, theses or any other publications or outputs) based wholly or in part on the material.
Disclaimer:
Use of the material is solely at the user's risk. The depositor, The Australian National University and the Australian Data Archive shall not be held responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the material supplied.
Other Study Materials
Related Publications:
Dee, S. and Jones, R. 'Population Survey and Decision Makers Survey 1991-1992: Technical Report. Australian Rights Project, 1992.
